We could
also create "Buy Alliance" and high tariff on all other goods and
services. China recently created many issues related to COVID-19 for exporting medical
equipment, international traffic over South China Sea, etc. China is ignoring
international rules.
We could
build many markets around the world larger than the China market. EU has 800
consumers, but consumed fewer products. Let's say EU has an equivalent of 500
millions of consumers as USA. USA and Canada has around 380 million consumers.
It'd take time to make EU market stronger, so we'd have more consumers. China
has around 1.2 billion consumers, but they’re not comparable to westerners in
terms of consuming goods. i.e. equivalent of roughly 500 million of westerners.
Buy Alliance
spread out to many nations, thus market remains competitive.
Btw, the
following countries could be founders of economic alliance
- USA
- Germany- France
- Italy
- Canada
- England
- Russia
- Brazil
- Australia
- New Zealand
- Japan
- South Korea
- Taiwan
- Israel
We could
start from the above countries.
Some of
policies for countries in Economic Alliance are
- Members must stay competitive (avoid ridiculous tariff or similar to "Buy America")
- Respect IPR (intellectual property rights)
- Support democracy and freedom of media
- Support standard labor law
- etc.
Personally I
think, 40 working hours per week is reasonable to make ourselves competitive.
There are many countries working 6 days per week.
However,
there are many members currently support 35 hours working week. They could try
37.5 working hours per week.
IPR is
important to economy.
* Companies
hire staff for R&D and come up with new ideas and patent those. This means
"job creation".
* People
risked mortgaging their houses to open a company for a dream. This means
"job creation".
If they
stole all ideas and patents without paying, it would mean "no company
would hire staff for R&D". It's also unfair for people risking their
assets to open a company.
To form the Economic Alliance doesn't require a lot of time and effort as members could pick common ground of all members to make it common rules. For example,
- Democracy
- Common
rules in all members' "Labor laws". Not union's rules.- Some good chapters in WTO
- Some good chapters in IMF
- Rules to ensure members stay competitive
- Rules to select new members or countries to trade with
- etc.
The reasons
to select a few European countries instead of EU were simple. Selected
countries have strong economy, thus all members are strong in economy. Members
could reach an agreement quickly and enact effectively.
Speaking of
economy status:
- Some said
that China is enjoying "under developing country" status with lots of
privileges.
The above
status is false as China is at the top or second position of most powerful
economy.
Personally I
think, 2-week of vacation per year is a good offer to new (graduate) employees.
After many years of experience, they could negotiate or be offered more
vacation days by employers.
For example,
Ericsson Canada offered its employees 3 weeks of vacation after staying with
them for 5 years. After 10 years, employees would get 4 weeks of vacation.
If we
noticed the common characteristics of the countries mentioned above, they
shared common stuff such as
- Strong
economy
- Democracy- Enforcing Law & Order
- Low criminal rates
- Acceptable life styles
- Work ethics
- etc.
With strong
economy and other common characteristics, the Economic Alliance could reach an agreement, and then execute those
quickly.
Why should we keep ourselve competitive? We will open our umbrella to compete with other companies outsides. Competition is a healthy part of society as it helps to create innovation, efficient work forces, lower product prices, better quality products, etc.
ReplyDelete